<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Poll: With the current maturity of LLMs and Genie, how are you positioning Genie in your org in Generative AI</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/generative-ai/poll-with-the-current-maturity-of-llms-and-genie-how-are-you/m-p/154996#M1761</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you see Genie (or similar AI analytics tools) as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":keycap_1:"&gt;1️⃣&lt;/span&gt; Primarily for power users / data-savvy users to enhance their daily work by correlating multiple business signals to generate deeper insights and answer more complex questions for the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":keycap_2:"&gt;2️⃣&lt;/span&gt; Suitable for broad organizational use for self-serve data questions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m currently leaning toward #1 (power users first).&amp;nbsp;My main concern with broad rollout is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not everyone can consistently formulate the right prompts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More importantly, not everyone can validate whether the output is actually correct or answering the intended question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Curious how others are thinking about this, especially for teams that have already moved beyond pilot stage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>juliechen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T21:01:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poll: With the current maturity of LLMs and Genie, how are you positioning Genie in your org</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/generative-ai/poll-with-the-current-maturity-of-llms-and-genie-how-are-you/m-p/154996#M1761</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you see Genie (or similar AI analytics tools) as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":keycap_1:"&gt;1️⃣&lt;/span&gt; Primarily for power users / data-savvy users to enhance their daily work by correlating multiple business signals to generate deeper insights and answer more complex questions for the organization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":keycap_2:"&gt;2️⃣&lt;/span&gt; Suitable for broad organizational use for self-serve data questions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m currently leaning toward #1 (power users first).&amp;nbsp;My main concern with broad rollout is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not everyone can consistently formulate the right prompts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;More importantly, not everyone can validate whether the output is actually correct or answering the intended question&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Curious how others are thinking about this, especially for teams that have already moved beyond pilot stage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 21:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/generative-ai/poll-with-the-current-maturity-of-llms-and-genie-how-are-you/m-p/154996#M1761</guid>
      <dc:creator>juliechen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T21:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

