<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lakebase Continuous Sync: Why My Synced Table Stayed Empty Despite a Healthy Pipeline in Lakebase Articles</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/lakebase-articles/lakebase-continuous-sync-why-my-synced-table-stayed-empty/m-p/163989#M75</link>
    <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;Today I ran into an interesting issue while setting up a &lt;STRONG&gt;Lakebase synced table&lt;/STRONG&gt; to sync a Delta table from our Lakehouse to Postgres using &lt;STRONG&gt;Continuous Sync&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything looked correct:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Change Data Feed (CDF) was enabled.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The pipeline was healthy.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The sync was running successfully.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet the destination Postgres table remained completely empty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There were no errors or warnings, which made the issue harder to diagnose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After investigating, I found that the problem was the &lt;STRONG&gt;primary key&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had configured CONTRACT_NO as the primary key because it seemed like the obvious business identifier. However, the source was a &lt;STRONG&gt;history table&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so multiple rows existed for the same contract.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since Continuous Sync relies on a &lt;STRONG&gt;unique primary key&lt;/STRONG&gt; to determine INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations, duplicate values meant the sync couldn't uniquely identify records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution was to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use a composite primary key (CONTRACT_NO, REPORT_DATE)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Deduplicate the source data before syncing&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;One quick query immediately exposed the issue:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT CONTRACT_NO, COUNT (*) FROM source table GROUP BY CONTRACT_NO HAVING COUNT (*) &amp;gt; 1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Key takeaway:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Before assuming there's an issue with the pipeline or platform, validate your data model. A business identifier isn't always a true primary key—especially in history or snapshot tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else encountered similar "no data, no error" situations with Lake base Continuous Sync? I'd love to hear what caused them and how you resolved them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Abhishek_sinha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-24T08:33:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lakebase Continuous Sync: Why My Synced Table Stayed Empty Despite a Healthy Pipeline</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/lakebase-articles/lakebase-continuous-sync-why-my-synced-table-stayed-empty/m-p/163989#M75</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;Today I ran into an interesting issue while setting up a &lt;STRONG&gt;Lakebase synced table&lt;/STRONG&gt; to sync a Delta table from our Lakehouse to Postgres using &lt;STRONG&gt;Continuous Sync&lt;/STRONG&gt; mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everything looked correct:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Change Data Feed (CDF) was enabled.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The pipeline was healthy.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The sync was running successfully.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet the destination Postgres table remained completely empty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There were no errors or warnings, which made the issue harder to diagnose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After investigating, I found that the problem was the &lt;STRONG&gt;primary key&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had configured CONTRACT_NO as the primary key because it seemed like the obvious business identifier. However, the source was a &lt;STRONG&gt;history table&lt;/STRONG&gt;, so multiple rows existed for the same contract.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since Continuous Sync relies on a &lt;STRONG&gt;unique primary key&lt;/STRONG&gt; to determine INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE operations, duplicate values meant the sync couldn't uniquely identify records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution was to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use a composite primary key (CONTRACT_NO, REPORT_DATE)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Deduplicate the source data before syncing&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;One quick query immediately exposed the issue:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SELECT CONTRACT_NO, COUNT (*) FROM source table GROUP BY CONTRACT_NO HAVING COUNT (*) &amp;gt; 1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Key takeaway:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Before assuming there's an issue with the pipeline or platform, validate your data model. A business identifier isn't always a true primary key—especially in history or snapshot tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else encountered similar "no data, no error" situations with Lake base Continuous Sync? I'd love to hear what caused them and how you resolved them.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/lakebase-articles/lakebase-continuous-sync-why-my-synced-table-stayed-empty/m-p/163989#M75</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abhishek_sinha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-07-24T08:33:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

