<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best sequence of using Vacuum, optimize, fsck repair and refresh commands. in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/4240#M1014</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a delta table whose size will increases gradually now we have around 1.5 crores of rows while running vacuum command on that table i am getting the below error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ERROR: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 7 in stage 491.0 failed 4 times, most recent failure: Lost task 7.4 in stage 481.0 (TID 4116) (10.154.64.26 executor 7): ExecutorLostFailure (executor 7 exited caused by one of the running tasks) Reason: Executor heartbeat timed out after 177186 ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and also wanted to know the best order of using &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VACUUM table RETAIN 168 HOURS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;optimize table;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fsck repair table table;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH table table;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 14:01:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-17T14:01:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best sequence of using Vacuum, optimize, fsck repair and refresh commands.</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/4240#M1014</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a delta table whose size will increases gradually now we have around 1.5 crores of rows while running vacuum command on that table i am getting the below error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ERROR: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 7 in stage 491.0 failed 4 times, most recent failure: Lost task 7.4 in stage 481.0 (TID 4116) (10.154.64.26 executor 7): ExecutorLostFailure (executor 7 exited caused by one of the running tasks) Reason: Executor heartbeat timed out after 177186 ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and also wanted to know the best order of using &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VACUUM table RETAIN 168 HOURS &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;optimize table;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fsck repair table table;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;REFRESH table table;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2023 14:01:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/4240#M1014</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-17T14:01:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best sequence of using Vacuum, optimize, fsck repair and refresh commands.</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/4241#M1015</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have access to the Executor 7 logs? is there a high GC or some other events that is making the heartbeat timeout? would you be able to check the failed stages? &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:39:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/4241#M1015</guid>
      <dc:creator>jose_gonzalez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-06T18:39:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best sequence of using Vacuum, optimize, fsck repair and refresh commands.</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/137812#M50819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my opinion&amp;nbsp;Best order: Optimize → Vacuum → FSCK Repair → Refresh.&lt;BR /&gt;Your error is likely a timeout — try more cluster resources or a longer retention period.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 17:28:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/best-sequence-of-using-vacuum-optimize-fsck-repair-and-refresh/m-p/137812#M50819</guid>
      <dc:creator>alex307</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-05T17:28:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

