<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Spark reparation vs coalesce in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/spark-reparation-vs-coalesce/m-p/24670#M17175</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Srikanth_Gupta_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-14T23:06:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spark reparation vs coalesce</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/spark-reparation-vs-coalesce/m-p/24670#M17175</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/spark-reparation-vs-coalesce/m-p/24670#M17175</guid>
      <dc:creator>Srikanth_Gupta_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-14T23:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spark reparation vs coalesce</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/spark-reparation-vs-coalesce/m-p/24671#M17176</link>
      <description>&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;B&gt;coalesce&lt;/B&gt; avoids a full shuffle and could be used to decrease the number of partitions&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;B&gt;repartition&lt;/B&gt; results in a full shuffle and could be used to increase or decrease the number of partitions&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:43:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/spark-reparation-vs-coalesce/m-p/24671#M17176</guid>
      <dc:creator>sajith_appukutt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-17T16:43:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

