<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using Variant to consolidate small tables with different schemas in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/using-variant-to-consolidate-small-tables-with-different-schemas/m-p/73891#M34677</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;With the announcement of Variant format, I'm wondering if this is a good way to consolidate small tables with varying columns and formats into a single normalized table? Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gracec</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-13T20:05:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Variant to consolidate small tables with different schemas</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/using-variant-to-consolidate-small-tables-with-different-schemas/m-p/73891#M34677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With the announcement of Variant format, I'm wondering if this is a good way to consolidate small tables with varying columns and formats into a single normalized table? Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2024 20:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/using-variant-to-consolidate-small-tables-with-different-schemas/m-p/73891#M34677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gracec</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-13T20:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

