<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cost comparison of DLT to custom pipeline in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/cost-comparison-of-dlt-to-custom-pipeline/m-p/75074#M34856</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;DLT is expensive in my opinion. I tried to run a simple notebook that just reads a parquet file into a dataframe and write it out to a cloud storage and I got an error that i hit my CPU instance limit for my azure subscription. I just gave up after that. But this was a year ago, don't know and not interested in the update on dlt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 01:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zume</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-20T01:54:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cost comparison of DLT to custom pipeline</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/cost-comparison-of-dlt-to-custom-pipeline/m-p/75051#M34854</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, our company currently has a number of custom pipelines written in python for ETL, and I want to do an evaluation of DLT to see if that will make things more efficient.&amp;nbsp; A problem is that there is a restriction on using DLT "because it is too expensive".&amp;nbsp; I have not been able to find information comparing the cost of DLT to a traditional pipeline, and because it is restricted, I cannot run an actual comparison.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone done this, or is anyone aware of cost comparisons I can use to either justify trying it, or to support the claim of it being comparatively expensive?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:51:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/cost-comparison-of-dlt-to-custom-pipeline/m-p/75051#M34854</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidS1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-19T19:51:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cost comparison of DLT to custom pipeline</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/cost-comparison-of-dlt-to-custom-pipeline/m-p/75074#M34856</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;DLT is expensive in my opinion. I tried to run a simple notebook that just reads a parquet file into a dataframe and write it out to a cloud storage and I got an error that i hit my CPU instance limit for my azure subscription. I just gave up after that. But this was a year ago, don't know and not interested in the update on dlt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 01:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/cost-comparison-of-dlt-to-custom-pipeline/m-p/75074#M34856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zume</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-20T01:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

