<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DLT-META requires ddl when using cdc_apply_changes in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/83281#M36900</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;You're hitting a bug or an unexpected behavior in the DLT-Meta package. Normally, the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cdc_apply_changes&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; feature shouldn't require a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;.ddl&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; schema file, especially if you're relying on schema evolution.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Check the package version&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: Ensure you're using the latest version of the DLT-Meta package. Sometimes, bugs are fixed in newer releases.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Look for a workaround&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: If the schema file is being incorrectly required, see if there's a way to bypass this by providing a minimal or empty schema file as a temporary fix.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Reach out to support&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: If it seems like a bug, reporting it to the maintainers of the DLT-Meta package might help. They might already have a fix or workaround.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;In the meantime, consider testing with a simple schema file to keep your pipeline moving forward.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 03:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tanay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-17T03:45:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DLT-META requires ddl when using cdc_apply_changes</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/83274#M36898</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are setting up new DLT Pipelines using the DLT-Meta package. Everything is going well in bringing our data in from Landing to our Bronze layer when we keep the onboarding JSON fairly vanilla. However, we are hitting an issue when using the cdc_apply_changes feature. As soon as we add that feature, the package will look for a .ddl schema file. Since we aren't using one, the package will fail when we start the pipelines.&amp;nbsp; Complaining it can't parse a null file&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For a bit of background, we plan on using schema evolution and would like to use the cdc_apply_changes to keep the bronze tables mostly similar to the source systems. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The cdc_apply_changes doesn't need a schema file, so I am confused about why one is now required. Is this just a bug in the DLT-Meta package? Does anyone have any suggestions?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 22:27:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/83274#M36898</guid>
      <dc:creator>m_weirath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-16T22:27:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLT-META requires ddl when using cdc_apply_changes</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/83281#M36900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;You're hitting a bug or an unexpected behavior in the DLT-Meta package. Normally, the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cdc_apply_changes&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; feature shouldn't require a &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;.ddl&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; schema file, especially if you're relying on schema evolution.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Check the package version&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: Ensure you're using the latest version of the DLT-Meta package. Sometimes, bugs are fixed in newer releases.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Look for a workaround&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: If the schema file is being incorrectly required, see if there's a way to bypass this by providing a minimal or empty schema file as a temporary fix.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Reach out to support&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: If it seems like a bug, reporting it to the maintainers of the DLT-Meta package might help. They might already have a fix or workaround.&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;In the meantime, consider testing with a simple schema file to keep your pipeline moving forward.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 03:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/83281#M36900</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tanay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-17T03:45:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLT-META requires ddl when using cdc_apply_changes</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/87753#M37439</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please check these details:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://github.com/databrickslabs/dlt-meta/issues/90" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/databrickslabs/dlt-meta/issues/90&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 03:33:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-meta-requires-ddl-when-using-cdc-apply-changes/m-p/87753#M37439</guid>
      <dc:creator>dbuser17</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-03T03:33:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

