<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DLT full refresh and resets in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/109149#M43229</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So that kind of approach would require additional logic outside of the DLT pipeline itself? Sounds doable, but the added complexity worries me, a lot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I don't understand why would I transfer data back to the main table because it's already populated in the end of refresh. Could you elaborate?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>antr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-06T11:01:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DLT full refresh and resets</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/109113#M43225</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When doing a full refresh in DLT, the ables seem to be in a reset/empty state until they're populated again. This can break downstream dependencies, if they try to use the data during pipeline execution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How to handle such case properly?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/109113#M43225</guid>
      <dc:creator>antr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-06T09:00:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLT full refresh and resets</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/109149#M43229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So that kind of approach would require additional logic outside of the DLT pipeline itself? Sounds doable, but the added complexity worries me, a lot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I don't understand why would I transfer data back to the main table because it's already populated in the end of refresh. Could you elaborate?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/109149#M43229</guid>
      <dc:creator>antr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-06T11:01:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLT full refresh and resets</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/112363#M44192</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG data-stringify-type="bold"&gt;&lt;A class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/125585" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/125585" data-sk="tooltip_parent"&gt;@antr&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In DLT, a full refresh on a streaming table resets state processing and checkpoint data, potentially disrupting downstream processes that rely on it.&amp;nbsp;To avoid this, use incremental updates (default) or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG data-stringify-type="bold"&gt;&lt;A class="c-link c-link--focus-visible" href="https://docs.databricks.com/aws/en/dlt/flows#append-flows" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="https://community.databricks.com/t5/training-offerings/databricks-lakehouse-fundamentals-certificate-and-badge-not/m-p/112361#M856" data-sk="tooltip_parent"&gt;append mode&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;instead of full refreshes whenever possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since DLT automatically repopulates tables after a refresh, schedule downstream jobs to run only after the pipeline completes to ensure data availability.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:59:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/112363#M44192</guid>
      <dc:creator>Advika</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-12T12:59:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DLT full refresh and resets</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/112443#M44211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; use incremental updates (default) or&amp;nbsp;append mode&amp;nbsp;instead of full refreshes whenever possible.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah that is the default how we'll work. But because of DLT's nature, full-refreshes are quite common during changes in the pipeline, so they can't be avoided.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; Since DLT automatically repopulates tables after a refresh, schedule downstream jobs to run only after the pipeline completes to ensure data availability.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That sounds possible for simple cases, but in bigger environments this is just not viable as there are so many dependencies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is one thing more that makes DLT look like a half-baked solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 06:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/dlt-full-refresh-and-resets/m-p/112443#M44211</guid>
      <dc:creator>antr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-13T06:57:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

