<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130943#M48947</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need some help, unable to get cluster up and running. I did try creating classic compute but fails, is there any limit to use databricks community edition?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;{
  "reason": {
    "code": "CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE",
    "type": "SERVICE_FAULT",
    "parameters": {
      "databricks_error_message": "Failed to launch the Spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. [details] X_ContainerLaunchFailure: Failed to launch spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. Exception: Could not add container for 0904-140909-n8zwc7e with address 10.172.231.165 \njava.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out with exception after 119 attempts (debugStr = 'waitUntilAttachable')\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff0(TimeUtils.scala:217)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff(TimeUtils.scala:144)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithTimeout(TimeUtils.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.waitUntilAttachable(LxcContainerManager.scala:1552)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.$anonfun$setUpContainer$1(LxcContainerManager.scala:372)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionContext(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperationWithResultTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation$(UsageLogging.scala:475)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperation(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.setUpContainer(LxcContainerManager.scala:170)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$10(NodeDaemon.scala:783)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$6(NodeDaemon.scala:749)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$4(NodeDaemon.scala:694)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionContext(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.recordOperationWithResultTags(Lo...",
      "instance_id": "i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9",
      "aws_api_error_code": "X_ContainerLaunchFailure",
      "aws_error_message": "Failed to launch spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. Exception: Could not add container for 0904-140909-n8zwc7e with address 10.172.231.165 \njava.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out with exception after 119 attempts (debugStr = 'waitUntilAttachable')\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff0(TimeUtils.scala:217)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff(TimeUtils.scala:144)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithTimeout(TimeUtils.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.waitUntilAttachable(LxcContainerManager.scala:1552)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.$anonfun$setUpContainer$1(LxcContainerManager.scala:372)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionContext(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperationWithResultTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation$(UsageLogging.scala:475)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperation(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.setUpContainer(LxcContainerManager.scala:170)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$10(NodeDaemon.scala:783)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$6(NodeDaemon.scala:749)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$4(NodeDaemon.scala:694)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionContext(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.recordOperationWithResultTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com..."
    }
  }
}&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-05T08:19:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130943#M48947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need some help, unable to get cluster up and running. I did try creating classic compute but fails, is there any limit to use databricks community edition?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error here:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;{
  "reason": {
    "code": "CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE",
    "type": "SERVICE_FAULT",
    "parameters": {
      "databricks_error_message": "Failed to launch the Spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. [details] X_ContainerLaunchFailure: Failed to launch spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. Exception: Could not add container for 0904-140909-n8zwc7e with address 10.172.231.165 \njava.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out with exception after 119 attempts (debugStr = 'waitUntilAttachable')\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff0(TimeUtils.scala:217)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff(TimeUtils.scala:144)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithTimeout(TimeUtils.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.waitUntilAttachable(LxcContainerManager.scala:1552)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.$anonfun$setUpContainer$1(LxcContainerManager.scala:372)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionContext(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperationWithResultTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation$(UsageLogging.scala:475)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperation(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.setUpContainer(LxcContainerManager.scala:170)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$10(NodeDaemon.scala:783)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$6(NodeDaemon.scala:749)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$4(NodeDaemon.scala:694)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionContext(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.recordOperationWithResultTags(Lo...",
      "instance_id": "i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9",
      "aws_api_error_code": "X_ContainerLaunchFailure",
      "aws_error_message": "Failed to launch spark container on instance i-08e0677f2fe8bb9b9. Exception: Could not add container for 0904-140909-n8zwc7e with address 10.172.231.165 \njava.lang.RuntimeException: Timed out with exception after 119 attempts (debugStr = 'waitUntilAttachable')\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff0(TimeUtils.scala:217)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithExponentialBackoff(TimeUtils.scala:144)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.util.TimeUtils$.retryWithTimeout(TimeUtils.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.waitUntilAttachable(LxcContainerManager.scala:1552)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.$anonfun$setUpContainer$1(LxcContainerManager.scala:372)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionContext(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.withAttributionTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperationWithResultTags(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation$(UsageLogging.scala:475)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.ContainerManager.recordOperation(ContainerManager.scala:93)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.container.LxcContainerManager.setUpContainer(LxcContainerManager.scala:170)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$10(NodeDaemon.scala:783)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$6(NodeDaemon.scala:749)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.common.logging.CmvOneLogger.containerLaunchLoggingWrapper(CmvOneLogger.scala:308)\n\tat com.databricks.backend.daemon.node.NodeDaemon.$anonfun$addContainer$4(NodeDaemon.scala:694)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:510)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:616)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:643)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(AttributionContextTracing.scala:80)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.$anonfun$withValue$1(AttributionContext.scala:336)\n\tat scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:332)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext(AttributionContextTracing.scala:78)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionContext$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:75)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionContext(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags(AttributionContextTracing.scala:127)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.AttributionContextTracing.withAttributionTags$(AttributionContextTracing.scala:108)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.withAttributionTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:611)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:519)\n\tat com.databricks.common.util.LockHelper$.recordOperationWithResultTags(LockHelper.scala:16)\n\tat com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:511)\n\tat com..."
    }
  }
}&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130943#M48947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T08:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130993#M48961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;UP!&lt;BR /&gt;Unable to start any compute. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130993#M48961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T12:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130994#M48962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/173840"&gt;@Khaja_Zaffer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe there is some capacity problem in AWS now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another thing, there is a following&amp;nbsp; limitation in databricks community edition -&amp;gt; y&lt;SPAN&gt;ou need to create a new cluster every-time and run it. Even in the same session if your cluster stops due to inactivity or some other reason, you will need to create a new cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, do you want to reuse already created cluster? If so, it's not possible. You need to create new one.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130994#M48962</guid>
      <dc:creator>szymon_dybczak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T13:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130995#M48963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/110502"&gt;@szymon_dybczak&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I have deleted all previous clusters and create a new one. the cluster is trying its best but unable to start, But yeah I used for practising so, I did good amount of data processing(mostly data used from kaggle or 1 GB dataset only), I am also thinking they might have some capacity limit!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:08:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130995#M48963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T13:08:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130997#M48964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'll try to create on my end. Maybe this is global issue. I'll let you know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Edit: Yep, it appears this is global issue. I've got the same error as you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="szymon_dybczak_0-1757078668013.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.databricks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19743i9C8C8978FBAABEB7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="szymon_dybczak_0-1757078668013.png" alt="szymon_dybczak_0-1757078668013.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 13:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/130997#M48964</guid>
      <dc:creator>szymon_dybczak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T13:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131002#M48966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/152834"&gt;@Advika&lt;/a&gt; can you please help here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131002#M48966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T14:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131003#M48967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One question, is there any reason you can't use databricks free edition?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131003#M48967</guid>
      <dc:creator>szymon_dybczak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T14:06:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131007#M48970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have all data uploaded in the volumne in community edition,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried using free edition, when I login by using my email it says this email has few accounts already existing, when I select any of them, it shows unlock account with debit or credit account or something like that&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Khaja_Zaffer_0-1757082262235.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.databricks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19744i9B96DF56B7FA1FFF/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Khaja_Zaffer_0-1757082262235.png" alt="Khaja_Zaffer_0-1757082262235.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 14:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131007#M48970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T14:26:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131052#M48973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/173840"&gt;@Khaja_Zaffer&lt;/a&gt;!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The best way forward is to move to the Free Edition, which offers a more stable environment than the Community Edition. &lt;BR /&gt;It looks like you’ve had multiple Free Trial accounts before, which is causing issues when trying to sign up for the Free Edition. In this case, I recommend raising a &lt;A href="https://help.databricks.com/s/contact-us?ReqType=training" target="_blank"&gt;Support ticket&lt;/A&gt; to request the deletion of those expired trial accounts. Once that’s resolved, you should be able to&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;set up a FE account at&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="c-link" href="http://signup.databricks.com/free" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-stringify-link="http://signup.databricks.com/free" data-sk="tooltip_parent" aria-describedby="sk-tooltip-33503"&gt;signup.databricks.com/free.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 17:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131052#M48973</guid>
      <dc:creator>Advika</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T17:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131053#M48974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/173840"&gt;@Khaja_Zaffer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, if your current e-mail address is currently preventing you from leveraging the Free Edition, can't you just use a different e-mail address for the Free Edition?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/152834"&gt;@Advika&lt;/a&gt;'s advice is the better route to go through ☺️.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All the best,&lt;BR /&gt;BS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2025 17:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131053#M48974</guid>
      <dc:creator>BS_THE_ANALYST</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-05T17:35:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CONTAINER_LAUNCH_FAILURE</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131547#M49130</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To all&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;legacy community edition is working fine if you use dbr &amp;lt;= 15.4 for both general and ML modes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think legacy community still far more better than free edition.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was selecting &amp;gt;15.4 DBR&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:46:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/container-launch-failure/m-p/131547#M49130</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khaja_Zaffer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-10T14:46:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

