<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic igrating from Cron-based Airflow to Lakeflow's Data-Aware Triggers — Real-world experiences? in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/igrating-from-cron-based-airflow-to-lakeflow-s-data-aware/m-p/168434#M55920</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of migrating our legacy Airflow DAGs (largely time-based cron schedules) to&amp;nbsp;Lakeflow Jobs, and I want to fully leverage the platform's event-driven capabilities rather than just replicating the old "timer-based" pattern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few questions for those further along in this migration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How are you using&amp;nbsp;File Arrival Triggers&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Table Update Triggers&amp;nbsp;to avoid running compute against empty or unchanged sources? Have you seen a measurable DBU savings from this switch?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For cross-workspace dependencies (Job A in Workspace 1 needs to complete before Job B in Workspace 2 starts), are you using a "Signal Table" pattern in Unity Catalog, or is there a more native way to handle this in Lakeflow?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How do you handle&amp;nbsp;"fan-out" dependencies—i.e., one upstream table update needs to trigger 5-6 downstream jobs owned by different teams? Are you managing this centrally, or letting each team own their own trigger subscription?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would love to hear the "messy" lessons learned, not just the documented happy path.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 18:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Khasim_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-09-12T18:34:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>igrating from Cron-based Airflow to Lakeflow's Data-Aware Triggers — Real-world experiences?</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/igrating-from-cron-based-airflow-to-lakeflow-s-data-aware/m-p/168434#M55920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of migrating our legacy Airflow DAGs (largely time-based cron schedules) to&amp;nbsp;Lakeflow Jobs, and I want to fully leverage the platform's event-driven capabilities rather than just replicating the old "timer-based" pattern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A few questions for those further along in this migration:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How are you using&amp;nbsp;File Arrival Triggers&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;Table Update Triggers&amp;nbsp;to avoid running compute against empty or unchanged sources? Have you seen a measurable DBU savings from this switch?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For cross-workspace dependencies (Job A in Workspace 1 needs to complete before Job B in Workspace 2 starts), are you using a "Signal Table" pattern in Unity Catalog, or is there a more native way to handle this in Lakeflow?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How do you handle&amp;nbsp;"fan-out" dependencies—i.e., one upstream table update needs to trigger 5-6 downstream jobs owned by different teams? Are you managing this centrally, or letting each team own their own trigger subscription?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would love to hear the "messy" lessons learned, not just the documented happy path.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 18:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/igrating-from-cron-based-airflow-to-lakeflow-s-data-aware/m-p/168434#M55920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Khasim_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-09-12T18:34:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

