<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data linkage and analysis with masked data in Data Governance</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150631#M2782</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for guidance to keep data masked if it needs to link with unmasked data, or analysis requires a combination of masked and unmasked data. How have you tackle this challenge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 21:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>whuang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-11T21:01:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data linkage and analysis with masked data</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150631#M2782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for guidance to keep data masked if it needs to link with unmasked data, or analysis requires a combination of masked and unmasked data. How have you tackle this challenge?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 21:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150631#M2782</guid>
      <dc:creator>whuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-11T21:01:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data linkage and analysis with masked data</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150649#M2783</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Assuming you are using Databricks Table RLS/CLM or ABAC RLS/CLM, this will work out of the box for the principal/identity who's allowed to see the dataset1:unmasked version of the masked data and dataset2: unmasked data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Though I would question how the same data element can be tagged in a way to be masked in 1 table and unmasked in another.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe you can elaborate with the actual business scenario and personas.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 02:38:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150649#M2783</guid>
      <dc:creator>MoJaMa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T02:38:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data linkage and analysis with masked data</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150696#M2784</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your initial response. The use case is principal/identity is allowed to see dataset 1 masked and dataset2 unmasked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dataset 1 is from UnityCatalog1 where the principal/identity does not have control over masking policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dataset2 is from UnityCatalog2 where the principal/identity has control over masking policy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any insight would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:10:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150696#M2784</guid>
      <dc:creator>whuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T14:10:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data linkage and analysis with masked data</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150709#M2785</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then you will have a problem unfortunately because from the perspective of the engine the principal is not allowed to see/use the real values from dataset1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The principal needs to be able to unmask the data from dataset1 for the actual "value" to be able to join to dataset2.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If they only see the masked value then you're joining *** to 123 which will not work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The masking rules should be setup in some sort of centralized fashion (ideally using using Governed Tags) so that the same rules apply to the same classification of data on all the datasets in a catalog/schema (using ABAC). Else you are gonna run into these inconsistencies.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150709#M2785</guid>
      <dc:creator>MoJaMa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T14:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data linkage and analysis with masked data</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150711#M2786</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for responding. It definitely gives us some thought of how far to extend "data mesh" principles in the physical data layer.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-governance/data-linkage-and-analysis-with-masked-data/m-p/150711#M2786</guid>
      <dc:creator>whuang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T14:41:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

