<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LLM experience in production in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/llm-experience-in-production/m-p/35540#M115</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;are LLMs really ready for production deployment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wsilveira</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-28T01:07:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LLM experience in production</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/llm-experience-in-production/m-p/35540#M115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;are LLMs really ready for production deployment?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/llm-experience-in-production/m-p/35540#M115</guid>
      <dc:creator>wsilveira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-28T01:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LLM experience in production</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/llm-experience-in-production/m-p/35743#M168</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Based on the KeyNote examples there are many relevant companies showing very complex data LLMs. I am assuming many of them use that in prod and therefore ready for usage.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 18:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/llm-experience-in-production/m-p/35743#M168</guid>
      <dc:creator>abetogi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-28T18:40:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

