<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Databricks SQL Semantic Layer on Roadmap in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/databricks-sql-semantic-layer-on-roadmap/m-p/35961#M5214</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Received a customer question who likes to model data in Power BI, how can Databricks support this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment recommendation is to leverage gold level aggregate tables and materialized views, which support time binning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Photon is also available to provide high performance and scalability.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Siddhuth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-28T22:23:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Databricks SQL Semantic Layer on Roadmap</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/databricks-sql-semantic-layer-on-roadmap/m-p/35961#M5214</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Received a customer question who likes to model data in Power BI, how can Databricks support this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment recommendation is to leverage gold level aggregate tables and materialized views, which support time binning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Photon is also available to provide high performance and scalability.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 22:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/databricks-sql-semantic-layer-on-roadmap/m-p/35961#M5214</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siddhuth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-06-28T22:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

