<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MLflow CVE-2023-6015 (vulnerabilities) in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/mlflow-cve-2023-6015-vulnerabilities/m-p/53285#M6147</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;what mlflow version is used for the "Databricks Managed MLflow"&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a workarround for MLflow CVE-2023-6015 (vulnerabilities) ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Timo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>332588</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-21T10:53:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MLflow CVE-2023-6015 (vulnerabilities)</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/mlflow-cve-2023-6015-vulnerabilities/m-p/53285#M6147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;what mlflow version is used for the "Databricks Managed MLflow"&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a workarround for MLflow CVE-2023-6015 (vulnerabilities) ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Timo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 10:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/mlflow-cve-2023-6015-vulnerabilities/m-p/53285#M6147</guid>
      <dc:creator>332588</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T10:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

