<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why does a join on (df1.id == df2.id) result in duplicate columns while on=&amp;quot;id&amp;quot; does n in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/why-does-a-join-on-df1-id-df2-id-result-in-duplicate-columns/m-p/102965#M8996</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/116355"&gt;@Tanay&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Your intuition is correct here. I&lt;SPAN&gt;n Apache Spark, the difference in behavior between on&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;(df1.id == df2.id)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;and &lt;STRONG&gt;on="id"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in a join stems&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;from how Spark resolves and handles column naming during the join operation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you use the first syntax (df1.id == df2.id), you are explicitly specifying a join condition using a column expression. Spark does not automatically deduplicate columns when using this approach.&lt;BR /&gt;Instead, the resulting DataFrame will contain all columns from both DataFrames, even if they have the same name. For example, if both DataFrames have a column named EmployeeNumber, the result will contain two columns:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;EmployeeNumber from df1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;EmployeeNumber from df2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spark handles the name conflict by qualifying the column names with their respective DataFrame aliases (if provided) or default names. For example, you might see &lt;STRONG&gt;df1.id&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;df2.id&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you use the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;on="id"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;syntax, you are specifying that the join should be based on a column with the same name in both DataFrames. Spark recognizes this as a natural join key and automatically deduplicates the column in the output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The resulting DataFrame will contain only one id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;column, which corresponds to the join key, and it will take the value from one of the DataFrames (typically the left DataFrame unless specified otherwise).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And why we have this difference in behavioir? The difference lies in how explicit column expressions (df1.id == df2.id) versus string column names (on="id") are interpreted:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Explicit Expressions (df1.id == df2.id)&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark treats df1.id and df2.id as separate entities.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No deduplication occurs; both columns are retained.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;String Columns (on="id")&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark identifies that id&amp;nbsp;is the same column in both DataFrames.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark deduplicates the column by keeping only one instance of id.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>szymon_dybczak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-23T09:12:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does a join on (df1.id == df2.id) result in duplicate columns while on="id" does not?</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/why-does-a-join-on-df1-id-df2-id-result-in-duplicate-columns/m-p/102960#M8995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Why does a join with on (df1.id == df2.id) result in duplicate columns, but on="id" does not?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I encountered an interesting behavior while performing a join on two Data frames. Here's the scenario:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="python"&gt;df1 = spark.createDataFrame([(1, "Alice"), (2, "Bob"), (3, "Charlie")], ["id", "name"])
df2 = spark.createDataFrame([(2, "Bob"), (3, "Charlie"), (4, "David")], ["id", "city"])&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I join the Data frames like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="python"&gt;joined_df = df1.join(df2, on = (df1.id == df2.id), how = "inner")&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It results in the id column appearing twice in the result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when I modify the join to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="python"&gt;joined_df = df1.join(df2, on="id", how="inner")&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It only keeps one id column, which is the behavior I was expecting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Can anyone explain why this happens? Does it have to do with how Spark handles column names or the join condition? Any insight would be appreciated!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 07:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/why-does-a-join-on-df1-id-df2-id-result-in-duplicate-columns/m-p/102960#M8995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tanay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-23T07:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does a join on (df1.id == df2.id) result in duplicate columns while on="id" does n</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/why-does-a-join-on-df1-id-df2-id-result-in-duplicate-columns/m-p/102965#M8996</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.databricks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/116355"&gt;@Tanay&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;Your intuition is correct here. I&lt;SPAN&gt;n Apache Spark, the difference in behavior between on&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;(df1.id == df2.id)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;and &lt;STRONG&gt;on="id"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;in a join stems&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;from how Spark resolves and handles column naming during the join operation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;DIV class=""&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you use the first syntax (df1.id == df2.id), you are explicitly specifying a join condition using a column expression. Spark does not automatically deduplicate columns when using this approach.&lt;BR /&gt;Instead, the resulting DataFrame will contain all columns from both DataFrames, even if they have the same name. For example, if both DataFrames have a column named EmployeeNumber, the result will contain two columns:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;EmployeeNumber from df1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;EmployeeNumber from df2&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Spark handles the name conflict by qualifying the column names with their respective DataFrame aliases (if provided) or default names. For example, you might see &lt;STRONG&gt;df1.id&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;df2.id&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you use the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;on="id"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;syntax, you are specifying that the join should be based on a column with the same name in both DataFrames. Spark recognizes this as a natural join key and automatically deduplicates the column in the output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The resulting DataFrame will contain only one id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;column, which corresponds to the join key, and it will take the value from one of the DataFrames (typically the left DataFrame unless specified otherwise).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And why we have this difference in behavioir? The difference lies in how explicit column expressions (df1.id == df2.id) versus string column names (on="id") are interpreted:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Explicit Expressions (df1.id == df2.id)&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark treats df1.id and df2.id as separate entities.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No deduplication occurs; both columns are retained.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;String Columns (on="id")&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark identifies that id&amp;nbsp;is the same column in both DataFrames.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Spark deduplicates the column by keeping only one instance of id.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:12:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/why-does-a-join-on-df1-id-df2-id-result-in-duplicate-columns/m-p/102965#M8996</guid>
      <dc:creator>szymon_dybczak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-23T09:12:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

