<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dynamic Bloom Filters for Inner Joins in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/106617#M9620</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you point me to the specific online resources that speak of this? My research has yielded very little in terms of guidance which is why I am reaching out here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tomvogel01</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-22T09:18:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic Bloom Filters for Inner Joins</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/106582#M9618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a question regarding combining the use of Bloom filters with Liquid Clustering to further reduce the data read during a join/merge on top of dynamic file pruning. Testing both combined worked extremely well together for point queries. However having Bloom filters on a table removed dynamic file pruning entirely and lead to the entire table being read when doing a join/merge with and without Photon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do Bloom filters work along side dynamic file pruning? If so, any thoughts as to what might be going wrong?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a plan to support such a functionality if not? If would be amazing to have it as it reduced the amount of data read by a factor of 20.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/106582#M9618</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomvogel01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-22T06:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Bloom Filters for Inner Joins</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/106617#M9620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you point me to the specific online resources that speak of this? My research has yielded very little in terms of guidance which is why I am reaching out here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 09:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/106617#M9620</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomvogel01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-22T09:18:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Bloom Filters for Inner Joins</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/107059#M9621</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We do not recommend&amp;nbsp;Bloom filters Index&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;on the Delta Tables as they have to be manually maintained.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you prefer photon - please try predictive I/O with Liquid Clustering.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 11:49:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/dynamic-bloom-filters-for-inner-joins/m-p/107059#M9621</guid>
      <dc:creator>NandiniN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-26T11:49:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

