<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What added advantage would using an Sql Alchemy database have, while I have an artifact destination for my MlFlow server? in Machine Learning</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/machine-learning/what-added-advantage-would-using-an-sql-alchemy-database-have/m-p/17679#M961</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for trying to help me @Kaniz Fatma​&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question was not to learn how to set up mlflow with postgres. But, to learn what additional advantage would using an sql-alchemy database like postgres would have, instead of storing all the metadata to files. that is, what advantage would I have, if I use an sql-alchemy for backend and not use one. please note that, the mlflow server will not be in '--artifacts-only' mode?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>naveen_marthala</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-06-23T13:09:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What added advantage would using an Sql Alchemy database have, while I have an artifact destination for my MlFlow server?</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/machine-learning/what-added-advantage-would-using-an-sql-alchemy-database-have/m-p/17677#M959</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am setting up mlflow server with Postgres and S3 on AWS ECS(or AWS EC2) for personal usage. I would like to know if using Postgres would actually give me any benefit?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as shown in &lt;A href="https://www.mlflow.org/docs/latest/tracking.html#scenario-5-mlflow-tracking-server-enabled-with-proxied-artifact-storage-access=" alt="https://www.mlflow.org/docs/latest/tracking.html#scenario-5-mlflow-tracking-server-enabled-with-proxied-artifact-storage-access=" target="_blank"&gt;scenario 5 &lt;/A&gt;in docs, I would like to set up server with proxied artifact storage, but without postgres in AWS RDS and also not in `--artifacts-only` and `--artifacts-only` modes as shown in &lt;A href="https://www.mlflow.org/docs/latest/tracking.html#scenario-6-mlflow-tracking-server-used-exclusively-as-proxied-access-host-for-artifact-storage-access=" alt="https://www.mlflow.org/docs/latest/tracking.html#scenario-6-mlflow-tracking-server-used-exclusively-as-proxied-access-host-for-artifact-storage-access=" target="_blank"&gt;scenario 6&lt;/A&gt; in docs. So, if i launch a mlflow tracking server like this, will all the metadata that usually gets saved to an SQLAlchemy database(postgres in my case) be saved to the location of attribute `--artifacts-destination` as files?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to do this to save costs from AWS RDS that runs Postgres.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;If you aren't familiar with AWS ECS, it is a fully managed service (a simpler version of kubernetes) that runs container base applications. and EC2 is just user managed machines or servers.&lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 06:47:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/machine-learning/what-added-advantage-would-using-an-sql-alchemy-database-have/m-p/17677#M959</guid>
      <dc:creator>naveen_marthala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-15T06:47:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What added advantage would using an Sql Alchemy database have, while I have an artifact destination for my MlFlow server?</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/machine-learning/what-added-advantage-would-using-an-sql-alchemy-database-have/m-p/17679#M961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for trying to help me @Kaniz Fatma​&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question was not to learn how to set up mlflow with postgres. But, to learn what additional advantage would using an sql-alchemy database like postgres would have, instead of storing all the metadata to files. that is, what advantage would I have, if I use an sql-alchemy for backend and not use one. please note that, the mlflow server will not be in '--artifacts-only' mode?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/machine-learning/what-added-advantage-would-using-an-sql-alchemy-database-have/m-p/17679#M961</guid>
      <dc:creator>naveen_marthala</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-06-23T13:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

