02-22-2022 11:18 PM
i facing the problem here in creating cluster in databricks.
Error as below :
Message
Cluster terminated.Reason:Unexpected launch failure
An unexpected error was encountered while setting up the cluster. Please retry and contact Databricks if the problem persists.
Internal error message: java.lang.RuntimeException: Internal error (no failure to report)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.AddResourcesStateHelper$.<init>(AddResourcesState.scala:204)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.AddResourcesStateHelper$.<clinit>(AddResourcesState.scala)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.shouldStopAddingNodes(ClusterManager.scala:3475)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.runAddResourceSteps(ClusterManager.scala:3625)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.addResourcesToCluster(ClusterManager.scala:3529)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.doAddContainersToCluster(ClusterManager.scala:1903)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.$anonfun$doUpsizeCluster$1(ClusterManager.scala:1361)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.$anonfun$resizeClusterWrapper$2(ClusterManager.scala:1285)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.withAuditLog(ClusterManager.scala:2212)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.$anonfun$resizeClusterWrapper$1(ClusterManager.scala:1282)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperation$1(UsageLogging.scala:341)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.executeThunkAndCaptureResultTags$1(UsageLogging.scala:435)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$recordOperationWithResultTags$4(UsageLogging.scala:455)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(UsageLogging.scala:215)
at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)
at com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:95)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext(UsageLogging.scala:213)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext$(UsageLogging.scala:210)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.withAttributionContext(ClusterManager.scala:126)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionTags(UsageLogging.scala:251)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionTags$(UsageLogging.scala:243)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.withAttributionTags(ClusterManager.scala:126)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags(UsageLogging.scala:430)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperationWithResultTags$(UsageLogging.scala:350)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.recordOperationWithResultTags(ClusterManager.scala:126)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation(UsageLogging.scala:341)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.recordOperation$(UsageLogging.scala:313)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.recordOperation(ClusterManager.scala:126)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.resizeClusterWrapper(ClusterManager.scala:1282)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.doUpsizeCluster(ClusterManager.scala:1329)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.ClusterManager.doSetupOrUpsize(ClusterManager.scala:2378)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.$anonfun$processRequest$3(UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.scala:339)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:213)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.util.ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.withConsolidatedClusterUpdate(ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.scala:52)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.util.ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.withConsolidatedClusterUpdateForAsync(ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.scala:86)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.util.ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.withConsolidatedClusterUpdateForAsync$(ConsolidatedClusterUpdateHelper.scala:84)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.withConsolidatedClusterUpdateForAsync(UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.scala:105)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.$anonfun$processRequest$2(UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.scala:339)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(UsageLogging.scala:215)
at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)
at com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:95)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext(UsageLogging.scala:213)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext$(UsageLogging.scala:210)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.withAttributionContext(UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.scala:105)
at com.databricks.backend.manager.UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.$anonfun$processRequest$1(UpsizeThrottlingMonitor.scala:338)
at com.databricks.backend.common.util.ParallelRunHelper.$anonfun$runTask$1(ParallelRunHelper.scala:52)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction1$mcVI$sp.apply(JFunction1$mcVI$sp.java:23)
at com.databricks.backend.common.util.GenericParallelRunHelper.$anonfun$runInParallel$3(ParallelRunHelper.scala:283)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(UsageLogging.scala:215)
at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)
at com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:95)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext(UsageLogging.scala:213)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext$(UsageLogging.scala:210)
at com.databricks.backend.common.util.GenericParallelRunHelper.withAttributionContext(ParallelRunHelper.scala:176)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionTags(UsageLogging.scala:251)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionTags$(UsageLogging.scala:243)
at com.databricks.backend.common.util.GenericParallelRunHelper.withAttributionTags(ParallelRunHelper.scala:176)
at com.databricks.backend.common.util.GenericParallelRunHelper.$anonfun$runInParallel$2(ParallelRunHelper.scala:283)
at scala.concurrent.Future$.$anonfun$apply$1(Future.scala:659)
at scala.util.Success.$anonfun$map$1(Try.scala:255)
at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:213)
at scala.concurrent.Future.$anonfun$map$1(Future.scala:292)
at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.liftedTree1$1(Promise.scala:33)
at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.$anonfun$transform$1(Promise.scala:33)
at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:64)
at com.databricks.threading.NamedExecutor$$anon$2.$anonfun$run$1(NamedExecutor.scala:359)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:23)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.$anonfun$withAttributionContext$1(UsageLogging.scala:215)
at scala.util.DynamicVariable.withValue(DynamicVariable.scala:62)
at com.databricks.logging.AttributionContext$.withValue(AttributionContext.scala:95)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext(UsageLogging.scala:213)
at com.databricks.logging.UsageLogging.withAttributionContext$(UsageLogging.scala:210)
at com.databricks.threading.NamedExecutor.withAttributionContext(NamedExecutor.scala:287)
at com.databricks.threading.NamedExecutor$$anon$2.run(NamedExecutor.scala:358)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
03-30-2022 11:40 AM
Hi @Giin Sing Wong It could have issues with AWS account quotas. Please check if you have the required CPU cores available in quota and share the cluster id and workspace URL if it continues to happen.
02-22-2022 11:46 PM
@Giin Sing Wong , could it be that your CPU quota has been reached?
02-24-2022 03:03 PM
Hi @Giin Sing Wong , What's your cluster mode?
03-30-2022 11:40 AM
Hi @Giin Sing Wong It could have issues with AWS account quotas. Please check if you have the required CPU cores available in quota and share the cluster id and workspace URL if it continues to happen.
04-11-2022 01:36 PM
Hi @Giin Sing Wong ,
Just a friendly follow-up. Is this issue still happening or you were able to resolve it by increasing your account's quota? Please let us know.
Join our fast-growing data practitioner and expert community of 80K+ members, ready to discover, help and collaborate together while making meaningful connections.
Click here to register and join today!
Engage in exciting technical discussions, join a group with your peers and meet our Featured Members.