Databricks Runtime 10.4 LTS - AnalysisException: No such struct field id in 0, 1 after upgrading

[Emiel_Smeenk]

Hello,

We are working to migrate to databricks runtime 10.4 LTS from 9.1 LTS but we're running into weird behavioral issues. Our existing code works up until runtime 10.3 and in 10.4 it stopped working.

Problem:

We have a nested json file that we are flattening into a spark data frame using the code below:

adaccountsdf = df.withColumn('Exp_Organizations', F.explode(F.col('organizations.organization')))\
                  .withColumn('Exp_AdAccounts', F.explode(F.col('Exp_Organizations.ad_accounts')))\
                  .select(F.col('Exp_Organizations.id').alias('organizationId'),
                                  F.col('Exp_Organizations.name').alias('organizationName'),
                                  F.col('Exp_AdAccounts.id').alias('adAccountId'),
                                  F.col('Exp_AdAccounts.name').alias('adAccountName'),
                                  F.col('Exp_AdAccounts.timezone').alias('timezone'))

Now when we query the dataframe it works when we do the following selects (hid results due to confidentiality):

display(adaccountsdf.select("*"))
 
OR
 
display(adaccountsdf)

When I display the schema of the dataframe we get the following:

root
 |-- organizationId: string (nullable = true)
 |-- organizationName: string (nullable = true)
 |-- adAccountId: string (nullable = true)
 |-- adAccountName: string (nullable = true)
 |-- timezone: string (nullable = true)

so everything looks like it should. The moment we start selecting the last 3 fields(adAccountId, adAccountName and timezone) we get the following error:

However when we select a single column it works fine:

 

Does anyone know why this is happening? It's a very strange error that only shows up in databricks runtime 10.4. All previous runtimes incl 10.3, 10.2,10.1 and 9.1 LTS work fine. The issue seems to be caused by using the explode function on an already exploded column in the dataframe.

UPDATE:

For some reason when I run adaccountsdf.cache() before I run my select statements the issue disappears. Would still like to know what's causing this issue in runtime 10.4 but not the other ones.

[Kaniz]

Hi @Emiel Smeenk​ ,

This guide helps you migrate your Azure Databricks workloads to the latest version of Databricks Runtime 10.x.

Databricks recommends that you migrate your workloads to a supported Databricks Runtime LTS version from that version’s most recent supported LTS version.

Therefore, this article focuses on migrating workloads from Databricks Runtime 9.1 LTS to Databricks Runtime 10.4 LTS.

[Emiel_Smeenk · Accepted solution]

It seems like the issue was miraculously resolved. I did not make any code changes but everything is now running as expected.

Maybe the latest runtime 10.4 fix released on April 19th also resolved this issue unintentionally.

[Nirupam]

@Emiel Smeenk​ 

We were facing the same issue and suddenly 2022-Apr-20 onwards it resolved itself.

Question:- Is there any website where I can see/track these "patches"?

Edit: Added Question.

[Kaniz]

Hi @Nirupam Nishant​  and @Emiel Smeenk​ , This page lists maintenance updates issued for Databricks Runtime releases.

April 19, 2022 - Maintenance updates

• We upgraded Java AWS SDK from version 1.11.655 to 1.12.1899.
• We fixed an issue with notebook-scoped libraries not working in batch streaming jobs.
• [SPARK-38616][SQL] Keep track of SQL query text in Catalyst TreeNode
• Operating system security updates.

[Kaniz]

Hi @Nirupam Nishant​ , Just a friendly follow-up. Do you still need help, or does my response help you to find the solution? Please let us know.

[Nirupam]

@Kaniz Fatma​ 

Your answer suffices my query. Thanks!

In addition, for fellow developers, I later noticed that these release notes are also available on the home screen of your Databricks workspace.

[Kaniz]

Hi @Nirupam Nishant​ , Thank you for the update and the valuable message for our community members. Since my answer suffices your query, would you like to mark my answer as the best?

[Nirupam]

@Kaniz Fatma​ I did not ask the original question.

@Emiel Smeenk​ had asked and answered his own question stating that the issue was fixed on its own (probably due to latest patch).

[Kaniz]

No worries @Nirupam Nishant​ . Either of you can mark the best answer. As the initial question was answered by @Emiel Smeenk​  himself, you can mark his answer as the best.

[Emiel_Smeenk]

Issue resolved on its own so selected that as the best answer for this post.

Thanks,

Emiel

[Kaniz]

Awesome. Thank you @Emiel Smeenk​ 😊 .