yesterday
In today’s data-driven world, organisations are drowning in information. From customer transactions and IoT sensor readings to social media interactions and operational logs, the volume and variety of data continue to grow exponentially. Yet many organisations struggle to extract meaningful insights from this wealth of information. The culprit? Poor data organisation and architecture.
Enter the concept of layered data architecture, with the ‘Medallion Architecture’ emerging as a particularly effective approach. This structured methodology for organising data has become a cornerstone of modern data engineering, enabling organisations to transform raw data into actionable insights while maintaining quality, governance, and scalability.
Layered data architecture is built on a simple yet powerful principle: organise data in progressive stages of refinement and quality. Rather than dumping all data into a single repository and hoping for the best, this approach creates distinct layers, each serving a specific purpose in the data journey from raw ingestion to business insights.
Think of it like a water treatment plant. Raw water enters the facility and undergoes multiple stages, including filtration, purification, and quality testing, before it’s safe for consumption. Similarly, raw data enters your system and progresses through layers of cleaning, validation, and enrichment before it’s ready for business consumption.
The Medallion architecture, popularised by Databricks and widely adopted across the industry, implements this layered approach through three distinct tiers: Bronze, Silver, and Gold.
The Bronze layer serves as your organisation’s digital warehouse for raw, unprocessed data. Here, data arrives exactly as it was generated or received - no transformations, no cleaning, just pure, unadulterated information. This includes:
The Bronze layer operates on the principle of “store everything, transform later.” By keeping the raw data unchanged, you always preserve full data lineage, allowing you to trace every result in the Silver or Gold layers back to its exact source.
This also gives you a powerful safety net. If business rules evolve or you discover an issue in your downstream transformations, you don’t need to pull the data again from the source system. You can simply return to the raw Bronze data and reprocess it correctly from scratch.
The Silver layer is where the magic of data transformation begins. Raw data from the Bronze layer is cleansed, validated, and standardised. This layer focuses on:
The Silver layer creates a reliable and consistent foundation that downstream processes can depend upon. Data engineers spend considerable time here, implementing quality checks and transformation logic that ensures data integrity.
The Gold layer represents the pinnacle of your data architecture: clean, aggregated, and optimised for business consumption. This layer contains:
Business users, data analysts, and BI tools primarily interact with the Gold layer, accessing data that’s been refined and structured specifically for their needs.
The layered approach isn’t just about organisation. It’s a governance strategy that addresses critical challenges facing modern data organisations.
Each layer in the Medallion architecture enables granular access control. Raw, potentially sensitive data in the Bronze layer can be restricted to data engineers and specific technical roles. The Silver layer might be accessible to a broader technical audience, while the Gold layer can be safely exposed to business users and external partners.
This tiered access model ensures sensitive information remains protected while enabling appropriate data democratisation across the organisation.
With clear layers, organisations can track data lineage from source to consumption. When a business user questions a metric in a Gold layer dashboard, data engineers can trace the calculation back through the Silver layer transformations to the original Bronze layer source. This transparency is crucial for:
Each layer transition provides an opportunity to implement quality gates. Data moving from Bronze to Silver can be validated against business rules, completeness checks, and accuracy standards. Similarly, the Silver to Gold transition can include more sophisticated validation, ensuring aggregations are correct and business logic is properly applied.
These quality gates prevent poor data from propagating through the system, maintaining the principle that data quality improves as it moves up the layers.
When business requirements change, the layered architecture provides clear boundaries for impact assessment. A change in business logic might only require modifications to the Silver or Gold layers, leaving the Bronze layer intact. This separation enables:
Organisations that skip layered data architecture face a host of challenges that compound over time, creating what data professionals often refer to as “data debt”.
Imagine an organisation that stores all its data — raw logs, intermediate calculations and processed analytics — into a single data lake. This approach might seem simpler initially, but it quickly becomes problematic:
Data Quality Deterioration: Without clear stages for cleaning and validation, poor-quality data spreads throughout the system like a virus, contaminating the entire system. A single corrupted data source can contaminate multiple downstream processes, making it difficult to identify and resolve issues.
Governance Chaos: With all data in one place, implementing appropriate access controls becomes nearly impossible. Either everyone has access to everything (a security nightmare), or access is so restrictive that productivity suffers.
Performance Degradation: Mixed raw and processed data creates inefficient query patterns. Analytics queries designed for clean, aggregated data struggle when forced to process raw, unstructured information, resulting in slow dashboards and frustrated users.
Organisations without proper data layering experience several hidden costs:
Increased Development Time: Developers spend disproportionate time cleaning and preparing data for each use case rather than building valuable features. A common estimate suggests that data scientists spend 80% of their time on data preparation, much of which could be eliminated with proper architecture.
Reduced Trust in Data: When users encounter inconsistent results or poor data quality, they lose trust in data-driven insights. This leads to decision-making reverting to intuition rather than analytics, negating the investment in data infrastructure.
Scalability Bottlenecks: Without a clear separation of concerns, adding new data sources or use cases becomes increasingly complex. Each addition requires understanding and potentially modifying the entire system rather than plugging into well-defined layers.
Compliance Risks: Regulatory requirements around data handling, privacy, and auditability become nearly impossible to satisfy without clear data lineage and governance structures.
Poor data architecture creates technical debt that becomes increasingly expensive to address:
Successfully implementing a layered data architecture requires careful planning and adherence to proven practices:
Define exactly what belongs in each layer and establish clear criteria for data promotion between layers. Document these standards and ensure all team members understand the boundaries.
Manual data movement between layers can create bottlenecks and introduce errors. Invest in automation tools and frameworks that can handle the routine aspects of data transformation and quality checking.
Implement monitoring at each layer to track data quality, processing times, and system health. Establish SLAs for each layer and measure compliance regularly.
Your data architecture will evolve as business needs change. Design your layers with flexibility in mind, using configuration-driven approaches whenever possible and maintain clear interfaces between layers.
The Medallion architecture and layered approach to data management aren’t just a technical best practice — it’s a strategic enabler for data-driven organisations. By implementing clear layers for raw data storage, cleansing and standardisation, and business-ready analytics, organisations create a foundation for:
Organisations that ignore these architectural principles do so at their own peril. The short-term simplicity of dumping everything into a single repository quickly gives way to long-term pain as data quality degrades, governance becomes impossible, and system complexity spirals out of control.
Investing in proper data layering pays dividends through improved productivity, better decision-making, and reduced risk. In an increasingly data-driven world, organisations can’t afford to build their data systems on shaky foundations. The Medallion architecture provides a proven blueprint for building data infrastructure that not only meets today’s needs but scales to meet tomorrow’s challenges.
The question isn’t whether your organisation can afford to implement layered data architecture — it’s whether you can afford not to. The cost of data debt only grows over time, and organisations that address these challenges early will have a significant competitive advantage in the future data-driven economy.
6 hours ago
@Senga98 ,
Excellent breakdown. The water-treatment analogy really lands. We’ve felt the impact of Bronze-to-Gold firsthand — it has saved us countless hours when we’re chasing down a root cause. There’s nothing better than being able to walk a questionable metric all the way back to its raw source without kicking off another round of ingestion.
Cheers, Louis.
6 hours ago
nice breakdown!!! simple yet clear.
4 hours ago
Thank you @Raman_Unifeye! I appreciate your feedback. I always try to break concepts down in a way that makes the ‘why’ behind data practices clear and practical.
4 hours ago
Thank you, @Louis_Frolio ! My next post is about Data Governance with Unity Catalog, stay tuned!!
Passionate about hosting events and connecting people? Help us grow a vibrant local community—sign up today to get started!
Sign Up Now