- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2024 03:20 AM
Hi,
Is liquid clustering a replacement to partitioning?
should we use still partitioning when we use liquid clustering?
Can we use liquid clustering for all cases and ignore partitioning?
- Labels:
-
Spark
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2024 03:38 AM
Yeah, you can think of it as a partitioning replacement.
According with documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/databricks/delta/clustering
Delta Lake liquid clustering replaces table partitioning and ZORDER to simplify data layout decisions and optimize query performance. Liquid clustering provides flexibility to redefine clustering keys without rewriting existing data, allowing data layout to evolve alongside analytic needs over time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
07-17-2024 03:38 AM
Yeah, you can think of it as a partitioning replacement.
According with documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/databricks/delta/clustering
Delta Lake liquid clustering replaces table partitioning and ZORDER to simplify data layout decisions and optimize query performance. Liquid clustering provides flexibility to redefine clustering keys without rewriting existing data, allowing data layout to evolve alongside analytic needs over time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2025 08:35 AM
I have built a decision tree on how to think about it https://www.canadiandataguy.com/p/optimizing-delta-lake-tables-liquid?triedRedirect=true

