In modern data engineering, automation is the backbone of stable, scalable, production-ready pipelines. Databricks File Arrival Triggers play a crucial role by automatically running workflows whenever a file is created in cloud storage.
But there is one fundamental limitation that becomes a major operational blocker:
"Databricks File Arrival Triggers do not fire when an existing file is overwritten with the same name"
This behavior is expected from ADLS and Event Grid - but it breaks automation in real pipelines.
In this blog, I’ll walk through a production-ready mechanism we built to overcome this limitation at scale:
A simple yet powerful pattern that guarantees reliable pipeline triggers-even when files are updated without changing their names.
Databricks File Arrival Triggers listen to Event Grid "Create" events in ADLS.
This works perfectly when:
A brand-new file is uploaded
A file with a new unique name is placed in the folder
But it fails completely when:
A file is overwritten with the same name
CI/CD deployments replace files using fixed filenames
Metadata files (table_config.csv, mapping_rules.csv) evolve without renaming
In all these cases:
No Create event → No trigger → No pipeline execution
This leads to silent failures - one of the most dangerous issues in data engineering.
In our environment, this limitation affected our central metadata ingestion pipeline:
PL_CSV_to_Delta
This pipeline converts metadata in ADLS into Delta format, powering downstream ETL logic.
However:
Metadata filenames rarely change
CI/CD deploys updates with the same name
ADLS does not emit a Modify event
Databricks never receives a trigger
This meant that updated rules, settings, or mappings were never ingested, causing pipelines to run with outdated logic.
We needed a solution that was:
Fully automated
CI/CD friendly
No renaming hacks
No timestamp-based filenames
No external schedulers like ADF or Airflow
100% reliable
At its core, the mechanism uses a small “signal” file to intentionally stimulate the trigger.
This file is named:
trigger_flag.csv
This file acts as an event generator - a guaranteed new file arrival every time a deployment occurs, regardless of whether the main file’s name changes.
Let’s walk through the mechanism in detail.
Inside our DevOps repo:
databricks_ConfigData/metadata/
We keep:
The actual metadata file(s)
The repo intentionally retains the flag file, but ADLS will not.
This difference is the core of the mechanism.
The YAML pipeline (azure-pipelines.yml) automatically deploys any changes in metadata to ADLS, including:
CI/CD does the following:
This mechanism ensures that every deploy, every update, every modification triggers the pipeline.
In the first cell of PL_CSV_to_Delta.py, we delete:
trigger_flag.csv
In this first cell itself, we delete the flag file.
To understand this mechanism more easily, consider the simple example below (just for explanation, not real production values):
| Location | (Example) File Count After Pipeline Start | Purpose / Interpretation |
|
Azure DevOps Repo (CI/CD) |
2 files (metadata + flag) |
Flag always preserved → acts as the permanent trigger initiator |
|
ADLS Dropzone |
1 file after deletion |
Ensures any next arrival of flag file is considered new and thus triggers the pipeline again |
Note: The counts above are only to demonstrate the concept.
In a real production environment, you may have multiple incoming data files - but the flag file logic remains exactly the same.
By keeping the flag in CI/CD and continuously deleting it inside ADLS, we ensure:
This + / – mechanism is what makes the entire trigger solution stable, repeatable, and production-friendly.
This is the magic.
Let’s say we update EDP_settings.csv by adding a new row.
CI/CD deploys:
What ADLS sees:
New file arrived → trigger_flag.csv
What Databricks sees:
Event Grid new file → Trigger pipeline
Even though the actual updated file (EDP_settings.csv) existed earlier, the flag file tricks the trigger system into firing.
The pipeline then:
This workflow is entirely automated and consistent.
The limitation was simple but severe:
Updating an existing file in ADLS does NOT generate a trigger.
This meant that even if metadata changed, the Databricks pipeline never executed.
To solve this without renaming files, adding timestamps, or using external schedulers, we introduced a controlled event-generating workflow using an empty flag file.
Here is exactly how we overcame the limitation:
In short, here is what was happening before the fix:
This broke the promise of full automation.
We introduced a new file:
trigger_flag.csv
This file acts as a guaranteed new arrival during every CI/CD deployment.
Here’s how the solution works clearly:
1.Flag file always exists in the repo
The repo permanently stores trigger_flag.csv.
2.CI/CD pushes the flag file to ADLS on every update
Even if the real metadata file name hasn't changed, the deployment introduces the flag file as a new creation.
3.ADLS treats the flag as a fresh event
Since it's a new file, ADLS generates a Create event.
4.Databricks File Arrival Trigger activates
The trigger runs because ADLS sent a new file event.
5.Pipeline deletes the flag file immediately
This ensures:
6.Updated metadata is processed successfully
Even if the main file (EDP_settings.csv) has the same name, the pipeline still runs and picks up the updated content.
Thanks to the flag file:
In essence:
We bypassed the ADLS overwrite limitation by generating our own controlled event - the flag file.
This is how we converted a platform constraint into a predictable and enterprise-ready automation pattern.
This solution may look simple - but its impact is massive.
By introducing a small, intelligent event signal file, we turned Databricks File Arrival Triggers into a fully dynamic, update-aware, DevOps-friendly automation system that works even with unchanged filenames.
It addresses a real limitation with a pragmatic, production-ready approach that is:
This pattern has proven extremely reliable in production and can be applied to any metadata-driven or CI/CD-driven data platform.
Sometimes, the simplest ideas unlock the biggest automation wins.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.