<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps in Data Engineering</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27303#M19180</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;@Joe Swanson​&amp;nbsp; @Werner Stinckens​&amp;nbsp;Yes, we have started rolling out the job ID logic as mentioned here to all workspaces. &lt;A href="https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalability-improvements" target="test_blank"&gt;https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalability-improvements&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-23T18:13:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27299#M19176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen something like this before? Today around midnight, our Job ID's started increasing in increments of quadrillions - was this a new change to how Job ID's are generated?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27299#M19176</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeWMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-22T20:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27300#M19177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If it helps, we've seen this in multiple Azure Databricks environments&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27300#M19177</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeWMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-22T20:38:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27301#M19178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I guess that is possible, maybe databricks rolled out an update or changed the ID logic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:23:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27301#M19178</guid>
      <dc:creator>-werners-</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-23T08:23:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27302#M19179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, it can go up to int64 so they aren't invalid values, but it's very strange that it would increase in increments of 1 and now is jumping sequences in large increments. In an account that we had daily processing for a about a year, job id value only made it to around 4 million - now we're in the quadrillions or so&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:51:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27302#M19179</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeWMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-23T15:51:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27303#M19180</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@Joe Swanson​&amp;nbsp; @Werner Stinckens​&amp;nbsp;Yes, we have started rolling out the job ID logic as mentioned here to all workspaces. &lt;A href="https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalability-improvements" target="test_blank"&gt;https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalability-improvements&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 18:13:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27303#M19180</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ravi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-23T18:13:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Databricks Job ID's increasing in massive sequence gaps</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27304#M19181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Ravi! Glad that this confirms my understanding&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-job-id-s-increasing-in-massive-sequence-gaps/m-p/27304#M19181</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeWMP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T17:26:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

