<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Field mapping in Get Started Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/field-mapping/m-p/72903#M7456</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What’s a good way to map ddiiferent datasets all to a standard set of variables. For example in table 1 there is an ‘user_number’ field. And table 2 has the same field but it’s labeled ‘user_id’. They are both the same, and I want to plug both into a pipeline with a standard name without having to write code each time to change the names.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>derek_s</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-12T18:54:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Field mapping</title>
      <link>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/field-mapping/m-p/72903#M7456</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What’s a good way to map ddiiferent datasets all to a standard set of variables. For example in table 1 there is an ‘user_number’ field. And table 2 has the same field but it’s labeled ‘user_id’. They are both the same, and I want to plug both into a pipeline with a standard name without having to write code each time to change the names.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.databricks.com/t5/get-started-discussions/field-mapping/m-p/72903#M7456</guid>
      <dc:creator>derek_s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-12T18:54:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

