For example, replies like this aren’t really necessary:
https://community.databricks.com/t5/community-articles/ci-cd-on-databricks-with-asset-bundles-dabs-a...

If you look at the original post, it already shows a practical approach and clearly reflects the author's real work and experience. Replies like this can give the impression of spam to the reader.

Instead, I would expect responses where someone shares their own experience, lessons learned, or practical insights related to the topic.

Another example: https://community.databricks.com/t5/data-engineering/databricks-spark-ui-showing-1-executors/m-p/150...
Louis Frolio’s reply was good and genuinely helpful to the author. However, the other agent-like reply gives the impression of spamming and doesn’t add much value to the discussion.

Sorry if this comes across as complaining. I’m just sharing my opinion in the hope of keeping the community standards high and avoiding unnecessary spam.