cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 
Administration & Architecture
Explore discussions on Databricks administration, deployment strategies, and architectural best practices. Connect with administrators and architects to optimize your Databricks environment for performance, scalability, and security.
cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

network security perimeter post-setup questions

Rjdudley
Honored Contributor

I've set up the network security perimeter with Terraform using Configure an Azure network security perimeter for Azure resources - Azure Databricks | Microsoft Lea... as my guide.  All of the resources associated to the NSP, and the Status of each is "Succeeded (View issues)"

Rjdudley_0-1780421763241.png

When I view the issue, it says

Provisioning state
Succeeded

Issue type
MissingIdentityConfiguration

Description
Enabling a managed identity (MI) is required to support intra-perimeter communication between resources. Only requests authenticated using MI are permitted for intraโ€‘perimeter access. While some capabilities for certain resources may continue to function without a MI, enabling one is strongly recommended to ensure secure access within the same perimeter or across linked perimeters.

Suggested access rules
None

Suggested resource IDs
None

Suggested fix
Enable managed identity (MI) to ensure this resource can securely access other resources within the same perimeter or across linked perimeters. This is recommended even though certain capabilities may still operate without one.

I didn't see anything in the docs one way or the other for this, is it a problem or can we ignore it?

Following the "Verify ..." step, I get this response (the path was copied from the table's Details)

[RequestId={guid} ErrorClass=INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE.LOCATION_OVERLAP] Input path url 'abfss://{container}@{storage account}.dfs.core.windows.net/__unitystorage/schemas/{guid}/tables/{guid}' overlaps with managed storage within 'CheckPathAccess' call.

It looks like that is working, but then again, no discussion one way or the other.  Is this expected since all our data access us through UC tables and therefore all locations are UC managed?

0 REPLIES 0