cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Data Engineering
Join discussions on data engineering best practices, architectures, and optimization strategies within the Databricks Community. Exchange insights and solutions with fellow data engineers.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Comparing Databricks Serverless Warehouse with Snowflake Virtual Warehouse for specific query

xx123
New Contributor III

Hey,

I would like to compare the runtime of one specific query by running it on Databricks Serverless Warehouse and Snowflake Virtual Warehouse.

I create table with the exact same structure with the exact same dataset in both Warehouses.

the dataset if self is quite simple, it has a id column (int), name column (string) and an array<double> with 5000 elements. The table has around 1.5M rows, ~40GB in size.

I want to run very simple query to compare the runtimes, but i need to make sure the entire table is scanned.

Query is as simple as `select * from table`. It works in Snowflake, but I cannot return all results in Databricks Warehouse. Even when i choose Download results, it only retreives part of them.

I tried to measure it by running CTAS and INSERT into a separate table, but it takes just a few seconds so there the result won't help me.

The reason why i choose this method is because we have also other engines where we executed the exact same queries, and all of them yielded the result. I would like to avoid using predicates to narrow down the results.

I also tried using Databricks Spark Cluster, and it worked fine.

Any ideas how to tackle this? Thanks!

1 REPLY 1

Krishna_S
Databricks Employee
Databricks Employee

 

You’re running into a Databricks SQL results delivery limit—the UI (and even “Download results”) isn’t meant to stream 1.5M × (id, name, 5,000-double array) back to your browser. That’s why SELECT * “works” on Snowflake’s console but not in the DBSQL UI. So don’t measure by returning the whole table.

Here’s how to do a fair, full-scan runtime comparison without changing the data or adding predicates:

Force a full scan but return 1 row

Make the engine read every column and array element and reduce them to a checksum. This avoids UI limits while still measuring scan/compute.

Databricks SQL 

-- Optional: avoid cached results
SET use_cached_result = false;

SELECT
  SUM(COALESCE(CAST(id AS BIGINT), 0))                                        AS s_id,
  SUM(COALESCE(LENGTH(name), 0))                                              AS s_name_len,
  -- read every element of the 5k-length array<double>
  SUM(AGGREGATE(arr, CAST(0.0 AS DOUBLE), (acc, x) -> acc + COALESCE(x, 0.0))) AS s_arr_sum
FROM your_catalog.your_schema.your_table;
  • Do the same SQL in snowflake as well to compare
  • This forces a full table scan, column decode, and array traversal on both engines.

  • Measure server-side runtime from each platform’s query history/profile (Databricks: Query Profile / query history; Snowflake: Query History). You’ll also see bytes read / rows scanned to verify it wasn’t a metadata shortcut.

Join Us as a Local Community Builder!

Passionate about hosting events and connecting people? Help us grow a vibrant local community—sign up today to get started!

Sign Up Now