If you're approaching this specifically as a migration validation use case, I'd separate the agent into two layers: the validation tools and the agent reasoning layer.
For example, expose controlled tools for querying Hive and Databricks, then have the agent compare row counts, schemas, null rates, key-level mismatches, and aggregate-level differences. This makes the agent useful for repeatable migration validation rather than just a chatbot over both data sources.
Weโve seen this pattern become particularly useful in enterprise data modernization projects, where the goal is not only to migrate data but also to automate the validation process across the old and new platforms.
Kartik Choudhary | Enterprise Data & Analytics