cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Get Started Discussions
Start your journey with Databricks by joining discussions on getting started guides, tutorials, and introductory topics. Connect with beginners and experts alike to kickstart your Databricks experience.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Using merge Schema with spark.read.csv for inconsistent schemas

JaydeepKhatri
New Contributor II

The Problem:

A common data engineering challenge is reading a directory of CSV files where the schemas are inconsistent. For example, some files might have columns in a different order, or be missing certain columns altogether. The standard behavior of Spark often leads to silent data corruption (column shifting) in these cases.

The Reproducible Example:

Here is a simple, self-contained example you can run in any Databricks notebook. It creates two CSV files in DBFS:

  • file_A.csv: The "correct" file with 3 columns: ConversationID,UserID,AgentName.

  • file_B.csv: The "problem" file with only 2 columns, which are also reordered and missing UserID: AgentName,ConversationID.

# --- 1. Setup: Create our test CSV files in DBFS ---

# Define file paths
dbfs_path = "/tmp/community_discussion_data/"
file_path_A = f"{dbfs_path}file_A.csv"
file_path_B = f"{dbfs_path}file_B.csv"

# Clean up previous runs
dbutils.fs.rm(dbfs_path, recurse=True)

# File A: The "complete" file
header_A = "ConversationID,UserID,AgentName"
data_A = '"conv_a1",101,"Alice"'
dbutils.fs.put(file_path_A, f"{header_A}\n{data_A}", overwrite=True)
print(f"Created File A: {file_path_A}")

# File B: The "problem" file (missing UserID, columns reordered)
header_B = "AgentName,ConversationID"
data_B = '"Bob","conv_b1"'
dbutils.fs.put(file_path_B, f"{header_B}\n{data_B}", overwrite=True)
print(f"Created File B: {file_path_B}")

Scenario 1: Reading WITHOUT mergeSchema(The Expected Problem)

First, let's read the directory without any special options. My expectation is that Spark will infer the schema from the first file (file_A.csv) and then positionally read the second file, causing a data shift.

# Reading without the mergeSchema option
df_without_merge = spark.read.csv(
    dbfs_path,
    header=True,
    inferSchema=False
)

print("Result WITHOUT mergeSchema:")
df_without_merge.show()
+--------------+-------+---------+
|ConversationID| UserID|AgentName|
+--------------+-------+---------+
|       conv_a1|    101|    Alice|
|           Bob|conv_b1|     null|
+--------------+-------+---------+

Scenario 2: Reading WITH mergeSchema (The Surprising Solution)

Now, let's run the exact same read but add .option("mergeSchema", "true"). According to the official Apache Spark documentation, this option should only apply to Parquet and ORC files.

# Reading WITH the mergeSchema option
df_with_merge = spark.read.option("mergeSchema"="true").csv(
    dbfs_path,
    header=True
)

print("Result WITH mergeSchema:")
df_with_merge.show()
+--------------+-------+---------+
|ConversationID| UserID|AgentName|
+--------------+-------+---------+
|       conv_a1|    101|    Alice|
|       conv_b1|   null|      Bob|
+--------------+-------+---------+

Analysis: This result is perfect! Spark correctly aligned the data by column name, placing "Bob" in AgentName and "conv_b1" in ConversationID, while correctly identifying that UserID was missing for that row and filling it with null.

My Questions for the Community:

This behavior is fantastic, but it leads to a few key questions:

  1. Is this an officially supported, enhanced feature of the Databricks CSV reader? The result is clearly what we'd want, but it seems to contradict the public Apache Spark documentation (see DataFrameReader docs, which doesn't list mergeSchema as an option).

  2. Is this the recommended best practice on Databricks for ingesting CSVs with inconsistent schemas? Should we be confident in using this in production over more complex patterns like manually grouping files and unioning them?

1 REPLY 1

bogomol312
New Contributor II

Very nice example  and explanation helped me a lot, thanks !