- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-22-2022 12:34 PM
Has anyone seen something like this before? Today around midnight, our Job ID's started increasing in increments of quadrillions - was this a new change to how Job ID's are generated?
- Labels:
-
DatabricksJobs
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2022 10:13 AM
@Joe Swanson @Werner Stinckens Yes, we have started rolling out the job ID logic as mentioned here to all workspaces. https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalab...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-22-2022 12:38 PM
If it helps, we've seen this in multiple Azure Databricks environments
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2022 12:23 AM
I guess that is possible, maybe databricks rolled out an update or changed the ID logic.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2022 07:51 AM
Yeah, it can go up to int64 so they aren't invalid values, but it's very strange that it would increase in increments of 1 and now is jumping sequences in large increments. In an account that we had daily processing for a about a year, job id value only made it to around 4 million - now we're in the quadrillions or so
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-23-2022 10:13 AM
@Joe Swanson @Werner Stinckens Yes, we have started rolling out the job ID logic as mentioned here to all workspaces. https://docs.databricks.com/release-notes/product/2021/august.html#jobs-service-stability-and-scalab...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-24-2022 09:26 AM
Thank you Ravi! Glad that this confirms my understanding