You can indeed leverage your partitioned column to read and process Change Data Feed (CDF) changes in partitions. This approach can help you manage the processing load and improve performance. Here's a general outline of how you can achieve this:
1. **Read the CDF changes with filtering by partition:**
You can read the CDF changes for a specific partition using a filter on the partition column.
2. **Process each partition separately:**
Iterate through the list of partition values, and for each partition, read the CDF changes and process them in the `foreachBatch` mode.
Here's an example of how you can implement this:
```python
from delta.tables import DeltaTable
import pyspark.sql.functions as F
# List of partition values (e.g., class numbers)
partition_values = ["class_a", "class_b", "class_c"] # Add all your partition values here
def process_partition(partition_value):
# Read the CDF changes for the specific partition
df_streaming_components = spark.readStream.format("delta") \
.option("readChangeFeed", "true") \
.option("maxBytesPerTrigger", "10G") \
.load() \
.filter(F.col("class_number") == partition_value) # Filter by partition value
df_streaming_components.writeStream.format("delta") \
.option("checkpointLocation", f"{checkpoint_loc}_{partition_value}") \
.foreachBatch(process_and_upsert) \
.outputMode("update") \
.trigger(availableNow=True) \
.start() \
.awaitTermination()
# Process each partition separately
for partition_value in partition_values:
process_partition(partition_value)
```
In this example, we're reading the CDF changes for each partition value, filtering the data by the partition column (`class_number`), and then processing and upserting the changes separately for each partition. This allows you to handle the heavy aggregations more efficiently by distributing the load across partitions.