Thanks Kaniz to your response. It would have been great to use a similar approach like the widgets to a normal notebook. Specifying these parameters at design time does not allow the flexibility needed for running my DLT pipeline truly metadata-driven.
I was also going towards using the job REST API from a notebook but then I ended up tweaking my configuration tables in a way that I can utilise a hardcoded parameter in the DLT definition and still have it dynamic.
If the REST API call functionality could be integrated into the workflows later on to pass these values as to other tasks, that would be really great!
I accept it as a solution because your third suggestion would work. I still keep hoping a more integrated approach will come in the future ๐