Did you watch the Bricktalks from last week about zerobus?
https://community.databricks.com/t5/bricktalks-tv/recording-bricktalk-zerobus-ingest-amp-cdc-workflo...
Your question came up in the Q&A.
Vicky Bukta is the PM and based on what I heard, it didn't seem to be a priority. I think they want you to curate/refine your data as you move it from a UC managed table into lakebase.
IMHO, I don't think it is reasonable to expect lakebase as a destination. There are already a lot of considerations/complexity when landing data into open table formats, let alone conventional database tables. I think it would be 10x more complex to make it work smoothly with lakebase, and even after it worked you would see a massively lower level of performance. Conventional databases have lots of additional considerations, like managing indexes, and respecting pessimistic locks/isolation. A UC managed table doing append-only additions can be extremely simple and fast.
