cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Data Engineering
Join discussions on data engineering best practices, architectures, and optimization strategies within the Databricks Community. Exchange insights and solutions with fellow data engineers.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Efficient Parallel JSON Extraction from Elasticsearch in Azure Databricks

OmarCardoso
New Contributor

Hi Databricks community,

I'm facing a challenge extracting JSON data from Elasticsearch in Azure Databricks efficiently, maintaining header information.

Previously, I had to use RDDs for parallel extraction, but they're no longer supported in Databricks. This forced me to switch to serialized extraction (dump command).

Request: I'm seeking advice on alternative parallel methods that can improve efficiency and maintain header information without requiring significant changes to my existing Spark SQL or DataFrame structure.

Any suggestions or experiences would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

1 REPLY 1

mark_ott
Databricks Employee
Databricks Employee

To efficiently extract JSON data from Elasticsearch in Azure Databricks—while maintaining header information and without reverting to legacy RDD-based parallelization—a few modern Spark-based strategies can be used. Spark DataFrames and Spark SQL support parallel processing natively, and several approaches have emerged to optimize extraction and structure retention.

Use DataFrame Parallelism

Spark DataFrames inherently support distributed, parallel processing. When reading JSON from sources such as Elasticsearch, you can specify options and partitioning under the hood without explicitly using RDDs. The Spark Elasticsearch connector or JDBC-based readers are designed for this and let you load data directly into DataFrames using .read.format("org.elasticsearch.spark.sql") or similar JDBC .read calls.​

Leverage JDBC Connector for Elasticsearch

A recommended method is using a JDBC connector, either native or third-party (e.g., CData JDBC Driver), to read from Elasticsearch in parallel. The JDBC driver optimizes query pushdown and handles metadata (including headers) efficiently, allowing Spark to pull data in parallel shards without serialization bottlenecks. You register the resulting DataFrame as a temp view for direct use with Spark SQL, maintaining schema/header information.​

Optimize with Partitioning and Schema Options

Whether using a direct connector or JDBC, you can use partitioning options (option("es.read.field.include", "header,data"), or specifying shard size, batch size) to facilitate efficient, parallel reads. This also ensures headers or metadata columns are kept intact. When loading files, using .option("header", "true") (for CSVs) or explicit schema hints and Delta Lake/Auto Loader in Databricks can help preserve header structure.​​

Pandas UDFs and Native Spark Functions

If you need additional processing, replacing Python UDFs with Pandas UDFs or using native Spark SQL expressions can retain efficiency. Pandas UDFs leverage Apache Arrow for fast serialization, supporting parallel operations and maintaining DataFrame schema.​

Practical Example

python
# Using JDBC for parallel extraction jdbcUrl = "jdbc:elasticsearch://your-host:9200" properties = {"user": "user", "password": "pass"} df = spark.read.jdbc(url=jdbcUrl, table="your_index", properties=properties) df.createOrReplaceTempView("elasticsearch_data") result = spark.sql("SELECT header_field, data_field FROM elasticsearch_data")

This approach maintains structural integrity and supports Spark’s parallelism.​

Summary Table

Method Parallelism Supported Header Info Maintained Changes Required
Spark DataFrame (Connector) Yes Yes Minimal
JDBC Connector Yes Yes Minimal
DataFrame .option() usage Yes Yes None (SQL/DF syntax)
Pandas UDFs Yes Yes Slight (function defs)​
 
 

Recommendations

  • Use the official Spark-ES DataFrame connector or JDBC for native parallel reads.

  • Set partitioning/batch options to maximize throughput.

  • Specify schema or use Auto Loader/schema hints for header preservation.

  • Avoid legacy RDD or UDF approaches; pivot to Pandas UDFs and Spark SQL functions for transformations.

  • Minimal code changes to your Spark SQL/DataFrame logic are needed.​

These options should allow you to efficiently parallelize Elasticsearch extraction in Databricks, keep header information, and stay within modern Spark API frameworks.​

Join Us as a Local Community Builder!

Passionate about hosting events and connecting people? Help us grow a vibrant local community—sign up today to get started!

Sign Up Now